Archive

Archive for the ‘Blogroll’ Category

Watchmen Stuff over at The Hog’s Head

I’ve started a series of posts on Watchmen at Travis Prinzi’s site in anticipation of the movie.  The novel is such a complex piece of fiction that I’ve decided to tackle it in installments by analyzing the characters.  After all, the book is a character study as much as anything.  

If you’re a fan, please check out my posts and offer feedback!  I make no claims to expertise in comics (or anything, for that matter); so, your thoughts would be most welcome!

In Harry Potter related news, there’s also footage from an Australian news program giving a two and half minute series of clips from the Half-Blood Prince movie — and it looks frikkin’ awesome!

When Freshmen Attack!

I’ve set up a blog for my World Cultures 120 students at the University of Evansville, something akin to what my students at Kentucky Wesleyan College have been up to.  But, WC120 is quite a bit different.  For starters, it is not a straightforward Rhet/Comp course.  It is part of UE’s writing curriculum, but it is more a cross between a writing course and a great books course.  The fall semester includes writing about and reading a number of texts from the classical world:  The Epic of Gilgamesh, Plato, The Qur’an, Genesis, and a number of other texts from multiple cultures around the world.  The spring semester becomes much more Euro-centric, beginning with Martin Luther’s On Christian Liberty, emphasizing thought development from the Renaissance, and stretching through the early 20th century.  I try to track their readings back to something they know from their own cultural experiences, or that they at least find relevant to them. 

I’ve posted three entries on the blog, two of which ask for their responses.  We’ve been reading Sor Juan Ines de la Cruz’s “Letter in Response to Sor Filotea”, a text widely considered to be a forceful 17th century advocacy of intellectual freedom and equality for women.  To my suprise, despite the letter’s difficulty (our translation maintains some arcane grammatical and syntactical forms), they read the letter with enthusiasm and did their best to understand it.  I tied Sor Juana’s argument into modern questions concerning gender equality, getting them to brainstorm and freewrite about gender differences and instances in which those differences manifest and in which we seem to transcend them.  Thus, I had them research and write in response to the Equal Rights Amendment.  If you peruse their responses, I think you’ll be impressed by some of their thinking.  It remains rather general, but the ideas are there.

I’ve also posted John Donne’s “Holy Sonnet XIV” as just one example of religiously themed poetry from the 17th century.  So far, their responses are quite good. 

One key component to using this version of Web 2.0 is the sense of audience it can create.  My students have so far completely changed their thinking and approach to writing — they feel as though they’re writing for an audience other than me.  For WC120, I’ve set two sections up on the same blog; thus, they are sharing ideas across sections on the blog, enhancing their sense of audience. 

For the coming fall semester, I’m scheduled to teach writing, an Introduction to Literature course, and I’ll probably teach World Cultures 110.  I’m considering establishing blogs for each school (Kentucky Wesleyan College will set them up, anyway), and perhaps developing a short podcast to supplement in-class instruction.  One of my favorite podcasts is Dave and Howard Shepherd’s The Word Nerds, devoted to “words, language, and why we say the things we do.”  It would be a natural template on which to base such a podcast.

But, I need to become much more tech savvy.  I write for The Hog’s Head, along with several others, but I know virtually nothing of how Travis creates the attending pubcast

The Tyranny of Wikipedia?

Andrew Sullivan’s The Daily Dish lead me to this article from Slate, arguing that community based databses like Wikipedia and Digg are not nearly as bottom-up and “democratic” as some think.  His argument is compelling, but only due to a slight misreading of the term “democratic”, which Wilson seems to interpret from a strictly Platonic stance: rule by everyone.  Still, his observations at least implicitly makes the point that we should pay attention to the nature of language.  I’m not sure Web 2.0 advocates are using “democratic” as Wilson seems to suggest.  Wikipedia’s “About” page says this:

Wikipedia is written collaborativelyby volunteers from all around the world. Since its creation in 2001, Wikipedia has grown rapidly into one of the largest reference Web sites. There are more than 75,000 active contributors working on some 9,000,000 articles in more than 250 languages. As of today, there are 2,257,262 articles in English; every day hundreds of thousandsof visitors from around the world make tens of thousands of edits and create thousands of new articles to enhance the knowledge held by the Wikipedia encyclopedia. (See also: Wikipedia:Statistics).

Visitors do not need specialised qualifications to contribute, since their primary role is to write articles that cover existing knowledge; this means that people of all ages and cultural and social backgrounds can write Wikipedia articles. With rare exceptions, articles can be edited by anyone with access to the Internet, simply by clicking the edit this page link. Anyone is welcome to add information, cross-references or citations, as long as they do so within Wikipedia’s editing policies and to an appropriate standard. For example, if you add information to an article, be sure to include your references, as unreferenced facts are subject to removal.

There is no need to worry about accidentally damaging Wikipedia when adding or improving information, as other editorsare always around to advise or correct obvious errors, and Wikipedia’s software, known as MediaWiki, is carefully designed to allow easy reversal of editorial mistakes. (para. 2-4; quote’s links are active)

The focus is on the ability to contribute; but there is still an editorial process evident – more a virtual republic?  Web 2.0’s emphasis is on collaboration or collectivization of knowledge and information.  I’m seeing something a straw man from Wilson’s argument.  Besides, a participatory culture necessitates participation, and consequently favors those who participate more. 

But, as a teacher, I’m constantly fighting with my students about how (or if) they should use Wikipedia.  The site’s own description and usage pages are quite cognizant that academia has a weary relationship with any source that doesn’t necessitate an expert review process (something academia is slowly reassessing in an effort to reengage with the community at large).  Even still, I generally tell my students to avoid the site because it is still very much a reference resource, mixing expert analysis with general knowledge. 

Categories: All Meta, Blogroll, Gray Matter

When Writing Students Attack!!!

Right now, my ENGL 1302 students are making their first forays into the blogosphere.  They are posting syntheses of the Gay Marriage debate using three different articles.  Check it out…

Please, do not leave comments at their site.  I’m trying to get them to trust putting their thoughts out in public…

Categories: All Meta, Blogroll

The Youth Vote, “Participatory Culture”, and Barack Obama

18 February 2008 Dave the Longwinded 4 comments

In today’s post at Henry Jenkins’s Confessions of an Aca-Fan, he writes an interesting rhetorical analysis of Barack Obama’s appeal to young people through the “Yes We Can” refrain, a group that Jenkins has increasingly defined as a “participatory culture” deeply invested in some forms of participation in which they feel empowered.  According to Jenkins, Obama’s use of language exudes a “bottom-up” process that young people have felt to be absent from politics until now.  The “We” pronoun is a profoundly powerful rhetorical appeal.